Read a real report before you buy one.
This one came back CONDITIONAL. We picked it on purpose, because a demo that only ever says yes isn’t worth much.
Summary and verdict
66/100
CONDITIONAL14 Renwick Street scores 66 out of 100, and the verdict is CONDITIONAL. The site has potential, but active constraints need resolution first.
The binding constraint is minimum lot size. At 327 m², it’s under the 450 m² a dual occupancy needs, so it caps at one house.
Biodiversity values are mapped over the parcel under the BC Act 2016, which takes 4 points off the constraint burden and makes a biodiversity study likely at DA stage.
All five pages.
Report CP·AU·2026·RPT·1198 for 14 Renwick Street, issued 26 Sep 2026, page for page as you would receive it.
14 Renwick Street
Marrickville NSW 2204
Lot 1 DP105334 · 327 m² · Inner West Council
Development Potential Score
66/100
CONDITIONALCivicPilot outputs are indicative planning intelligence, derived from published instruments and cited to clause. They are not certified planning advice, they do not constitute development consent, and they are not a guarantee of approval.
Summary and verdict
66/100
CONDITIONAL14 Renwick Street scores 66 out of 100, and the verdict is CONDITIONAL. The site has potential, but active constraints need resolution first.
The binding constraint is minimum lot size. At 327 m², it’s under the 450 m² a dual occupancy needs, so it caps at one house.
Biodiversity values are mapped over the parcel under the BC Act 2016, which takes 4 points off the constraint burden and makes a biodiversity study likely at DA stage.
Planning controls
The parcel is zoned R2 Low Density Residential under Inner West LEP 2022. Height of buildings is capped at 9.5 m under cl 4.3, and floor space ratio at 0.60:1 under cl 4.4.
At 327 m², the lot is under the 450 m² a dual occupancy needs, so the controls allow one dwelling house. This is the single control driving the CONDITIONAL verdict.
Overlays, constraints and yield
No heritage, flood or bush fire layer applies to the parcel. Biodiversity values are mapped, and they are the one overlay that costs the site points.
Yield and feasibility are modelled from the controls above and published cost indices at the dates in section 05. They are not a quantity surveyor’s estimate or a valuation.
Method, data currency and sources
The score has four dimensions of equal weight, each out of 25. The verdict comes from the band the score falls in. When a control does not resolve to a clause, the report shows PENDING for it and never uses a guessed value.
CivicPilot outputs are indicative planning intelligence, derived from published instruments and cited to clause. They are not certified planning advice, they do not constitute development consent, and they are not a guarantee of approval.
An ordinary R2 lot, which is the point.
Most of the sites on your list look like this: low density residential, a narrow lot, controls that are fine until they aren’t. The report shows you where Renwick Street runs out of room, and it names the clause.
Read it the way your committee would. If a number looks wrong, the clause is right there beside it, so you can check.
How the score is builtCivicPilot outputs are indicative planning intelligence, derived from published instruments and cited to clause. They are not certified planning advice, they do not constitute development consent, and they are not a guarantee of approval.
Score your next site.
One address, one report, every control cited to its clause.
$290 per report. No subscription required.