Five pages. Same order, every time.
Your committee learns where to look once. After that, every report reads the same way, whichever council it came from.
Read the Renwick Street report- 01
Cover
The address, the document ID, the score and its verdict, the four dimensions and a location plan.
- 02
Summary and verdict
The verdict in plain words, the binding constraint, and how the four dimensions add up to the score.
- 03
Planning controls
Each control with its value, clause and currency date, and a plan cut of the lot from the cadastre.
- 04
Overlays, constraints and yield
Every overlay at the parcel and the points it costs, the indicative yield and the modelled feasibility.
- 05
Method, data currency and sources
The verdict bands, the date each layer is current to, and every clause the report read.
The one control you’d negotiate.
Four scores tell you where a site is weak. The binding constraint tells you which control is doing it.
On 14 Renwick Street it’s the lot size. At 327 m², the lot is under the 450 m² the engine needs for a dual occupancy, so it caps at one dwelling house.
Six steps, and it shows its working at each one.
Step timings are deliberately absent. We’ll publish them when there’s a reproducible benchmark to publish.
- 01
Resolve the parcel
The address is geocoded, then snapped to that state’s cadastre. You get the lot and DP wherever the state publishes them.
Output · Resolved lot geometry, council, state framework
- 02
Read the controls
Zone, FSR, height, minimum lot size and setbacks come from the state’s own planning service, then any encoded council override applies. Conflicts resolve in instrument order.
Output · Each control with its value, unit, source and clause
- 03
Layer the overlays
Heritage, flood, bushfire, landslide and biodiversity are queried at the parcel and turned into severities, not just yes or no.
Output · Constraint set, each with its severity and clause
- 04
Model the yield
Yield is the minimum across every constraint path, not the friendliest one. Whichever path wins is the binding constraint.
Output · Buildable envelope, indicative dwellings, binding constraint
- 05
Score the dimensions
Four dimensions, each out of 25, equal weight, then a bounded feasibility modifier.
Output · DP Score and verdict
- 06
Compose the report
One five-page PDF in the same order every time, with the score and its working shown.
Output · The report, every claim sourced
Screening that informs your advice, and never replaces it.
Sort a client’s list before you spend a day on any one site. Every control carries its clause, so you can check it against the instrument in minutes. Anything unresolved says PENDING, and you decide what happens next.
Subscribers also get the desktop app, with saved sites and a portfolio board for the whole pipeline.
Score your next site.
One address, one report, every control cited to its clause.
$290 per report. No subscription required.